Are there qualities of nonfiction make it naturally better than fiction?
The question of whether or not it is possible to decisively say nonfiction is better than fiction seems impossible. The type of writing in nonfiction and fiction are distinctly different, however, is there something about the nature of their composition that makes one naturally better than the other? Well, let’s see.
Before we answer which is better, we should probably figure out what are the qualities that separate good writing from the rest of the pack. To produce writing that people want to read, a writer must be skilled with diction and syntax, must confront the reader with compelling ideas, and must root their work in truth.
Before we answer which is better, we should probably figure out what are the qualities that separate good writing from the rest of the pack. To produce writing that people want to read, a writer must be skilled with diction and syntax, must confront the reader with compelling ideas, and must root their work in truth.
The ultimate goal of fiction is, arguably, to be engaging. Writers tell stories about emotion and empathy while balancing a fine line to also being engaging. This is all good except for one thing- it isn’t true. See, nonfiction conveys an unparalleled level of truth as it deals with the infinitely complex nature of reality. It is a common adage that history repeats itself. So being in the spotling of being able to make a change in the world around us, wouldn’t it be obvious that we should learn from past behavior?
A personal account of a backpacking trip might run “With no previous backpacking knowledge, I had a lot to learn to get up to pace. ... When the trip was nearing an end, I was chosen as a leader to map out and guide my group of six for the last four days. ... Although I wasn’t always able to find success, this expedition turned out to be the best experience of my life. I learned to be empathetic and supportive. Most importantly I learned the value of teamwork.” (Fang) This account follows the progress of the writer through a difficult excursion. Because it is told in the first person and draws directly on the writer’s experiences, it is convincing and impressive. This story however, can easily been made up and were it falsified by someone who had never been on such a trip, it would lack the detail and sincerity that make it effective.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.