The Rip Van Winkle Project

Making an active effort to keep up with the news is not as important as it seems. Looking back on major events such as the death of Osama Bin Laden, the revolution in Egypt, and the first appearance of Ebola, most important news stories will find their way to people through social media and word of mouth. For this reason, the man who is doing the Rip Van Winkle project’s addiction to the news is not something that one could say is the healthiest addiction. He writes, “Not caring about anything beyond the extent of one’s own front bumper can result in a person who is an egotistical ignoramus and a poor citizen of this representative democracy in which, ideally, all of us participate”(thevanwinkleproject.blogspot.com). Feverishly following every piece of news is not necessarily productive if it causes one to divert too much attention from her own life. Taking more interest in one’s own life and looking out for major national and international events is not the same as “not caring about anything beyond the extent of one’s own front bumper”(thevanwinkleproject.blogspot.com). Rather, paying fair attention to both one’s news and one’s life is like seeing one’s entire car and most of the surrounding road. It is essential to a healthy lifestyle to be self-aware.  For the sake of the health of one’s personal life, no news may be bad but too much news is worse.

Rip Van Winkle Project Response

In the last decades, technology has transformed worldwide communication. At the click of a button, an individual from across the world can communicate with someone on the opposite side of the globe. Most importantly, technology allows people to become more globally aware and informed. In a project based on the story of “Rip Van Winkle” by Washington Irving where excessive alcohol consumption and abuse causes a man to be isolated from his family and friends, “Birdie” attempts to challenge his need to constantly be informed by the news. His determination to cut himself off all of communication is admirable; however, in a society where technology plays a significant role in the lives of every person the project of “Birdie” seems unreasonable. Even if “Birdie” restricts himself from directly receiving information from the newspaper, radio and TV, he will still hear of major events by word of mouth. “Birdie” has asked his friends to help him in his project but the reality is that the world is too interconnected through the Internet and television to avoid the global news. An alternative and more reasonable solution to the news addiction of "Birdie"could have been to limit his exposure to the news to certain times or only through certain mediums because ultimately it is inevitable that "Birdie" be informed of any global crisis. 

A Synthetic Slumber

A year without news would be incredible waste of time. Birdie, the man  conducting the experiment, is interested to know what his life would be like if he were asleep to the world like Rip Van Winkle was for twenty years. The difference between the two is that Birdie is willingly falling “asleep” while Van Winkle was tricked into his comatose state. The reasoning behind the experiment is pure curiosity, but a real Rip Van Winkle sleep would entail no news or contact with anyone since in his sleep he was completely unaware of everything going on around him, even the weath. Imagining life without updates of the world’s current events in this modern world is like trying to live without a car in Los Angeles. That is to say it is nearly impossible, not that many people would even considering attempting it. Birdie is an interesting fellow who decided to try what may be one of the hardest feats in the current age. His attempt at falling “falling asleep” is truly commendable.

"Rip Van Winkled"

Michael Solazzo

10/15/14

Rip Van Winkle Blog

http://goo.gl/D3gP37 

The title of the blog post, “Trying to Reclaim the Old Normal,” presents an interesting concept. The “Old Normal” is essentially last year’s models and styles that still have left an impact on the current culture.  For example, new sayings and new mannerisms that have become common, but were undiscovered a year ago.  The categories used: politics, history, economy, sports and entertainment are the categories of culture that determine peoples’ lifestyles.  No one can no what would be in the parenthesis if they “Rip Van Winkled” themselves in the year 2014.  The speed of progress on Earth is growing exponentially, meaning this experiment could be done over and over with drastically varying results and personal amazments.  The “Old Normal” would be different, more elaborate and extensive.  The shock and awe would increase and eventually it would become hard for the person to reintegrate with their society.  The person could spend the rest of their lives attempting to “reclaim the old normal,” but at that point the old normal might not be worth the time.  It might be better to attack the new lifestyle head on as opposed to trying to retrace history.  The Rip Van Winkle experiment creates the unique opportunity for one to “Sparknote” the past, learning what others already know, instead of living through it. 

10-16-14

Response to being “Van Winkled”

This experiment is surprising for someone to conduct today because it would be very difficult to “stay asleep” with all of the technology and forms of information exchange today. From the improvement of smart phones to the availability of the internet, information can go from one country to another in the matter of seconds. Not to mention, most gas stations, restaurants, gyms, all have tvs in them constantly playing the news. It would be nearly impossible to live one’s life normally without being exposed to any major news. Because of how challenging this would be, one would need a durable support group around him. The author stated how he was going to need to help of others: “I am depending on cooperation from family and friends and colleagues,” (I’ve been Van Winkled). Accordingly this experiment is not only challenging because it requires flawlessness, but because it requires effort from anyone connected to the conductor.

http://thevanwinkleproject.blogspot.com/p/project.html

Birdie or Albert Haley

http://thevanwinkleproject.blogspot.com/2011/09/news-of-lowercase-m-e.html

The secretive nature of Birdie’s identity builds another layer of mystery throughout Birdie’s Blog. Birdie conducted an absurd experiment based off of Washington Irving’s “Rip Van Winkle”. Birdie takes this seemingly fictional story and turns it into reality. In Irving’s short story, Rip Van Winkle finds himself drinking too much alcohol and fading away into a 20 year snooze. After waking up, Rip is surprised by everything that had changed, after all it was 20 years. Birdie, an online blogger, conducted an experiment in which he cut himself off from all information pertaining to his present time. This made Birdie totally oblivious to current issues and news. From the moment he cut himself off from the world to the day he “returned”, birdie’s identity was kept a secret. A couple days after “waking up”, birdie exposes his identity. In the blog post above, he gives an in depth life summary along with news about what he was presently doing. Keeping his identity a secret not only depersonalized the blog, but it also kept readers interested. The mystery of who Birdie really was captured readers attention. This specific blog post was a “historic” moment in the whole blog. Seeing that Birdie was an ordinary local college professor connected the occult blogger with many of his readers. This moment symbolized the era of Birdie “being awake”.

The Van Winkle Project- Undoable with the rising generation

Reading about The Van Winkle Project will leave the readers asking themselves if they could participate in falling “asleep” for a whole year.  Our society today, on the contrary, has become so technologically dependent that it would be a miracle if a person from the current rising generation (anyone born from 1990-2014) could participate in an experiment like this.  The college professor, named Birdie, in his experiment, isolated himself from all news: weather, sports and entertainment.  Birdie’s main reason for participating in this is to cure, as he describes, his relationship to all of these things or his “news addiction”.  He states, “It’s not much of a stretch to say that I’m addicted to the news. Give me newspapers, magazines, reliable websites, and interesting television programming and I’m ready to devour them all” (About me page).  Birdie describes this news addiction as abnormal; however, with this new generation a news addiction is completely normal.  It is very rare to find someone who does not know about the new iPhone, latest football game or the newest dirt on a celebrity.   He describes it as an “insatiable curiosity,” but someone who does not have this is considered out of the norm.  Moreover, especially now a days, technology is advancing at such a rapid pace that someone will be at a huge disadvantage when the “wake up”.  To give an example, five years ago the first iPad came out and now the tablet a common household object.  This advancing is something no one wants to miss out on because of all the innovative products that are arriving faster than ever.  Therefore, with this new generation, an experiment like this would be a remarkable accomplishment.

Van Winkle - Seeing Fiction in a Different Light

            One of the many powerful components of Rip Van Winkle is the way in which the story perfectly paints a picture of the world where Rip lives. It is wonderful how much freedom Washington Irving exercises in this work of fiction. However, while the place Irving depicts is beautiful, picturesque, and to a degree, almost magical, it is not reality. This fact is no secret and while many fiction lovers read fiction because it can take them to the reaches of their imagination, there is one piece that often goes missing. Fiction often lacks the ability to relate to people’s lives to the point where one can picture them experiencing it. In Rip Van Winkle, when Rip returns after 20 years, his experience is without doubt amazing, however, due to the foreign setting and the fact that Rip Van Winkle is in fact fiction, it is difficult to picture oneself in his position. This is why reading “birdie’s” blog post, which describes a present day Rip Van Winkle scenario, is so important to read after reading Rip Van Winkle. While “The Rip Van Winkle Project” obviously cannot compare to Rip Van Winkle in terms of literary importance, “The Rip Van Winkle Project” is able to make one think about the importance of knowledge and how hard it would be to lose all sense of current events by creating a present day Rip Van Winkle scenario. Rather than comparing Washington’s Irving’s timeless and masterful “Rip Van Winkle” to a blog post, it is important to read both to get the fully appreciate the story.

The Van Winkle Project--insight on the effects of technology

A privilege people have nowadays is being able to know every piece of news around the world with a push of a button. Taking that away is like taking a compass or GPS away from a traveler. Without them, humans are lost and ignorant. In order to achieve this great of a goal of the “Van Winkle Project,” Birdie must have a lot of motivation to be able to let go of something he is so used to and something that is so imbedded into our culture. Time flies by, and people are not aware of just how fast it goes. So much happens in a year, and Birdie’s project is a good way of seeing just how much the new technology has affected the citizens of the world. The author speculates about what will happen while he is “asleep” and writes, “In the absence of facts and information, am I able to read clues as to what has happened in people’s behavior or from a subtle but detectable buzz in the air?” (Birdie). This questions sparks up other questions that might have been answered when he “woke up,” giving insight on the effects of technology in people’s lives.

The Hypocrisy in the "Van Winkled" Blogger

http://thevanwinkleproject.blogspot.com/2010/11/so-sorry-youre-sorry-my-dears.html

Men who wonder about feminist issues often tend to misinterpret the reasons behind them. On September 11, 2010,  a male college professor living in the United States started a new experiment: The Van Winkle Project. His project centers around Washington Irving’s short story, “Rip Van Winkle,” where Rip sleeps for 20 years and misses several important news events. Inspired by Rip’s oblivion, the anonymous blog user “Birdie” decided to virtually “fall asleep” for a year, ignoring all forms of news. In his post titled “So Sorry You’re Sorry, My Dears,” the blogger questions the reason behind women always apologizing to men. Although the writer’s intentions seem curious and innocent, he fails to discover several important factors in these female tendencies. He writes about personal space, claiming that when women “believe they’ve been inadvertently intruded, oh, my, gosh, within five feet of my personal space” (Birdie) an apology is given. The college professor might have the right intentions in defending women, but Birdie has no idea what he’s talking about. Birdie fails to mention that maybe the reason women are in a constant apologetic state is because of men like his beloved inspiration, Rip. The fictional is the perfect example of another man who hates a bold woman. Dame Van Winkle, as a colonial wife in America, has several big responsibilities including cooking, cleaning, and raising the children. She asks her husband to help her out with a couple of chores but is treated with contempt, making her the perfect example of woman being mistreated. “Rip Van Winkle” exemplifies how women who are blunt in requesting something from men are responded with hatred, and that the only way for women to get things done is by asking politely. Women have been taught to treat men with respect, a subconscious act that is seen even in modern society. The blogger in charge of The Van Winkle Project ignores the patriarchal message emitted in the book he bases his entire blog around, while still wondering to himself why women succumb to misogynist tendencies.

Van Winkle Project – interesting idea, problematic reality

     The Van Winkle Project, though interesting, has issues that could make it unwise or at least exceedingly difficult to undertake. With this project, Birdie strives to avoid practically all “news, weather [reports], sports, and entertainment” for an entire year (http://thevanwinkleproject.blogspot.com). However, depending what Birdie means by sports and entertainment, this endeavor could hurt his relationships with others. People spend a lot of time relaxing with sports and entertainment, and cutting these activities out of his life could hurt his relationship with those he used to pursue sports and entertainment with. Husbands generally spend time with their spouse pursuing entertaining activities, so with these bonding activities outlawed, one is led to wonder if Birdie’s relationship with his wife will suffer. It might also be more difficult for Birdie to have deep discussions with his son because of his lack of information about the current world. Lastly, this endeavor seems unwise because it would make unwinding so much more difficult, and therefore could make Birdie more unpleasant with others. Without the option to read for pleasure, watch television, play sports, or even go bowling with a friend, Birdie is stuck with getting into nature, talking with others or eating to unwind because almost any other action can be considered “entertainment.” Though Birdie is left with some enjoyable activities, it is understandable that Birdie might quickly grow tired of the recreational activities he can pursue. Without many ways to enjoy himself, Birdie can become unhappy and as a result do or say things to others that he would later regret. The Van Winkle Project seems like an interesting idea, but could result in hurt relationships because of the nature of its restrictions.

To Be, or Not To Be, Van Winkled

“To be Van Winkled” may sound like a phrase straight out of a Dr. Seuss book, but that’s not the case. Birdie, an online blogger, “coined” the verb to express his state while he was without any news from the world for one full year. Of course, Birdie was not asleep for the entire 365 days; instead, he blocked out any and all news from social media including natural catastrophes, “man-made” disasters (or as Birdie says, a “tragic happening” (Birdie 1)), and any other news-worthy events, excluding those in his own personal life. His “information black out” (Birdie 1), as he calls it, is a choice not many would make nowadays because of how the entire world is based off of the idea of staying connected. That one year disconnect would be a heavy burden to bear for anyone who loves hearing about current events, cares about what’s going on internationally, or just needs their weekly “Keeping Up with the Kardashians” fix. Birdie’s Van Winkling is obviously not a challenge that’s made for everyone to try, but it’s something that everyone should think about. A year without knowledge of how the world changes might seem simple, but it would be very difficult to accomplish because of how integrated the news is in people’s day-to-day schedule. It appears on the radio, television, magazines, and social media, especially Facebook and Twitter which were both made to share information globally. Avoiding current events for an hour (to get work done, for example) is difficult in itself, which means that Van Winkling must be one of the greatest challenges to try to do in this day and age.

The Van Winkle Project Response

October 14, 2014

The Van Winkle Project Response

http://goo.gl/HRxTav

The concept of living an entire year in today's news-driven world without gathering any information on current events is remarkable. Each day thousands of articles are written by everyone from giant news outlets to common bloggers; in addition, hours of breaking news shows fill the television channels. To isolate oneself from all current news is an extremely difficult task and it seems rather unnecessary except in extreme circumstances. As Birdie from the Van Winkle Project describes, before his experiment he had been a news junkie. When news is dictating one's life it may be necessary to limit his access, however for most people this change is not needed. The alteration in Birdie's perspective came as a result of how much influence the news had over his life to begin with. While the news is omnipresent in almost everyone's life, a radical shift in accessibilty would not have as significant of an impact. As an example, at boarding school there is a relative "bubble," due to a lack of television accessibility. The effects of this "bubble" are not nearly as substantial as the effect that a year in isolation had on Birdie. Limiting one's access to current events may be beneficial and open his or her eyes to a new perspective, but to "sleep" for an entire year is excessive unless in extreme cases.

Waking up from the Van Winkle Project

10/14/2014

Response to: Van Winkle Project

The most surprising part of the first blog post after Birdie "woke up" was his attitude towards the information that was thrown at him. He spoke about his pancake recipie as much as he talked about the past year of events that were revealed to him. This is shocking for multiple reasons, but it symbolizes a change in his priorities. Prior to the news-free year, Birdie identified as a "news addict." In his autobiography page, he spoke of his constant focus being on headlines and his inquisitive mind always engaging in conversation about worldly events. After, he focuses on his family and pancakes. He voluntarily continues his Sunday morning routine without news. He is no longer an addict; he is through the withdrawal stage. He has adjusted to life without headlines. Birdie asks questions about the year's news in his blog post rather than reacting to it with conclusions or apparent emotions. Headlines are created in a manner that intends on invoking emotion and desire to read more. Having news presented to Birdie in a concise presentation by his son and wife is a change from his previous way of obtaining news. Facts and events from the year serve a new purpose for Birdie after he wakes up.

Rip Van Winkle Project--Denying Notifications

People are dependent on many things in the 21st century. Cell phones, tv's, and the news-- all three are distractions that are seemingly essential to human life. What one man did to combat the ever-increasing flow of information and dependence is something so simple, yet profound, that everyone should attempt. The man, a professor and blogger who goes under the pseudonym of "Birdie" in his blog, decided to go one year without ever seeing, hearing, or reading the news. He called his project "The Rip Van Winkle Project." This unenlightnement, in a sense, is a crucial undertaking, essential to the understanding of what people are capable of and what their essence is. SImplicity is a value overlooked too often in our modern society. What “Birdie” did should be emulated by people around the world to realize that they are capable of living without constant notifications and updates. Without the constant notices, people would become more interpersonal and connected to one another. In the end, this is all “Birdie” wanted.

The Van Winkle Project - an Unattainable Goal

The thought of completely disconnecting one’s self from outside new is quite daunting. However, Birdie decided that he would do so for one whole year starting September 11, 2010 until September 11, 2011. His inspiration for this came from Washington Irving’s short story “Rip Van Winkle,” where a man goes to the woods where he sleeps for 20 years and returns to see the society he knew to be completely different. In present day, Birdie decides to ignore the news for a year because he describes himself as being addicted to the news. Rip went into a physical slumber and Birdie’s plan is to go into a slumber to the outside commotion. Although the idea behind Birdie’s plan is legitimate, it is almost impossible to pull off. In today’s world one is constantly surrounded by news. Although he says that he will look away from headlines on magazines and newspapers, it is impossible to do so. Without trying one will get news from posters around you or covers – it is unavoidable and not realistic that one will not see these. Even though Birdie’s plan to ignore all news for a year, it is impossible to do so unless coincided with physical isolation as well. 

Rip Van Winkled Then and Now

Society has changed tremendously since the original setting of "Rip Van Winkle", which took place around the Revolutionary war in America. Presently, life seems to move more rapidly; all information is readily available, electronics and media dominate lifestyles, and people are easily connected to anywhere in the world. Humans can accomplish tasks easier with technology, can travel efficiently, and communicate easily.The man who took on the "Van Winkle Project", has chosen to turn a blind eye to all news, weather, sports, and entertainment for a year. He is metaphorically going to "sleep" like Rip Van Winkle in Washington Irving's short story. The feat this man accomplished is incredible. He conquered psychological yearnings to satiate his curiosity of what is happening in the world. Because he was not "allowed" to examine any type of news, this self-established barrier would make one more curious, but this man was able to persevere. Also despite being accustomed to being somewhat aware of the affairs of the world, this man had to all of a sudden go into "ghost mode" and adjust to be accommodated with a void. When the man "woke up", the world can assume that he had a lot of catching up to do on TV.

Van Winkle Project Response

The Van Winkle Project by the blogger is a good way to exclude oneself from the distractions there are in todays’ society. The main goal of this project is to be Van Winkled, which means the author of the blog will be totally blocked away from the current, new weather, sports and entertainment. By doing so, the author is said to be “asleep” from September 11, 2010 to September 11, 2011. However, the author is conscience of his or hers personal life. When the author awake, the author will find out all the changes that have happened during this year. During his “sleeping” year, the author can live the life that people once had. The author can just enjoy his personal life without the distraction from the news, entertainments, and anxiety. It is a smart way to just be, and live in the moment of things. When people are distracted by their phones and computers, they are missing out on the basic moments that are happening around them. Through the Van Winkle Project, people can learn to appreciate the little events around them and determine what is truly important to themselves. http://goo.gl/AuE5sG

In Which Older Technology is Superseded by New Technology

Birdie’s article “My Top News Story for 2011” purports to explore Birdie’s top news article from when they undertook their year-long break from news. Instead, Birdie talks about a few articles that would have been their favorite had they known about them then veers directly into the idea that older technology is better with a transition as smooth as your average train crash. After reading the article, I was a bit confused. Birdie claims that as we move further into “science fiction”, we’ll be bringing along a lot of older technology because it’s better than the newer alternatives. Birdie points to books, analog watches, running shoes with toes, and vinyl LPs as technologies that we’ll bring with us into the future. However, all these technologies have been superseded by new technology that is superior in every respect: ebooks replaced books, digital/smart watches replaced analog watches, and vinyl LPs were replaced by far superior digital audio equipment. Note that I left out running shoes with toes; that’s because they’re not an old technology at all, merely drawing inspiration from running barefoot.

Then vs. Now- The Van Winkle Project

While the time between 2011 and 2014 is only three years, times have certainly changed. With technology rapidly advancing, the way we interact with others is different. Everyone is constantly interested in what is going on in the world, whether it be broadcasted on the TV screen, posted on social media, or overheard during a conversation. Nowadays, it would be almost impossible to go a year without hearing of any news. This is what one man did in a project he called the “Van Winkle Project.” He went from 2010-2011 avoiding all news on current events. He went to extreme measures to not hear about anything that was going on in the world. This is similar to the story of Rip Van Winkle, a man who disappears into the mountains for twenty years, and emerges a stranger in his own town. While the man who did this may have been able to avoid all news in 2011, one would have a difficult time doing this today, now that technology plays a larger role in our lives.

Crevecoeur, Hughes, and Hope

     Crevecoeur’s Letters from an American Farmer and John Hughes’ Weird Science are two seemingly unrelated works. Yet these disparate works both touch upon the theme of hope. Hope unites these two works, and gives rise to another way one can interpret Crevecoeur’s Letters.

     Both Crevecoeur's Letters and Hughes Weird Science are filled with hope. In Crevecoeur’s third and seventh letter, he establishes what he hopes Americans will be, and in his ninth letter, he writes about who he hopes his kindsmen will not become. Similarly, Hughes' movie is filled with hope - in fact, the whole plot is based upon the effects of the protagonists's hope.

     One should read Crevecoeur’s Letters from an American Farmer with hope. Crevecoeur's farmer in his Letters shows what awaits the hopeless in difficult situations: depression and disillusionment. In Crevecoeur’s last letter, “Distresses of a Frontier Man,” Crevecoeur laments the fall of America in the Revolutionary War. Disillusioned with America, Crevecoeur’s farmer highlights the violence and horrors of the war, and accuses it of robbing his generation of future happiness (xroads.virginia.edu). He even describes life itself as “a mere accident, and of the worst kind; we are born to be victims of disease and passions, of mischances and death; better not to be than to be miserable (Taylor 45).” , One should read Crevecoeur’s last letter with hope, for without hope, it is easy to become disillusioned with life in difficult times, like the farmer in Crevecoeur’s Letters. Yet with hope, one clings onto the possibility of better times, and continues to move forward.

Striving for a future: Weird Science vs. Early American Writings

Morgan Cockrell

Both weird Science and early American writings of Winthrop and Cr´vecoeur embody change by striving for a more positive future. In John Winthrop: A Modell of Christian Charity (1630), Winthrop states “we must not content ourselves with unusual ordinary means. Whatsoever we did, or ought to have done, when we lived in England, the same we must do, and more also, where we go…” (Winthrop, 2). Here, the author portrays that the new colonists must not settle on the typical layout of life in Britain, but instead go beyond that and accomplish what they want. This connects to Weird Science because Gary and Wyatt begin the movie by deciding they want more from their current lives than being pantsed by school bullies, Ian and Max. They then depict their new motivation by making Lisa, which was a conscious decision in order to improve their lives. They then continue this by doing what they always ought to have done-deciding to have fun at a party. With learning to strive for what they want boys then are able to effectively diminish the subordination in their lives, which along with Winthrop’s point, taught them to not be content with their ordinary lives. After consciously deciding to change their lives, the boys transformed their lives for the better, gaining the freedom and equality they always wanted.Throughout their adventure, Gary and Wyatt embody the main point of this first early American writing: striving for more than that which makes one content.

Oppression in Weird Science and Early American Literature

Though Weird Science is in no means a direct or easy comparison to early American literature, it does have some surprising similarities.  Both watchers and readers will see that the film and the writings deal with the struggle of an oppressive powerful figure.  One early American text that connects to the theme of being oppressed as shown in Weird Science is Benjamin Franklin’s The Autobiography.  In his story, he describes various people superior to him that he had to deal with.  One example is his older brother who mistreated him and looked down towards him.  In Weird Science Chet, the older brother, is constantly beating up Wyatt and taking advantage of the boys.  Additionally, “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” is yet another early American writing that relates to the oppression from a bigger figure.   In his sermon, Jonathan Edwards tries to scare people into converting to Christianity.  This fear mongering can again be related to Wyatt’s oppressive older brother Chet.  Chet tries to scare the boys into becoming submissive teenagers that do whatever he wants them to do.  Moreover, Hector St. Jean de Crevecoeur’s “What is an American?” shows oppression from a higher power on a much larger scale.  Crevecoeur, in his writing, talks about how America is now a free nation and no longer associated with Europe.  In the movie, Lisa acts similarly to Crevecoeur.  She begs to Wyatt and Gary to improve their lives by standing up to their fears. Connecting 80’s pop culture to rich early American literature is an amusing thought when examined on the surface; however, interestingly enough, connections between the themes both the film and the writings use can be made by looking in-depth at the message they all are trying to convey.

Weird Science, a Metaphor for Early American Literature and History?

Weird Science, directed by John Hughes, is a movie from the 1980’s that even for its time would have been considered strange.  While it is unlikely that John Hughes created the movie as a metaphor for early American literature, there are some interesting connections between the two.  The colonists and Wyatt and Gary, the two teenagers, lives revolved around one idea.  Religion was a driving force for the early colonists.  They spent their lives working for God and praying that they would be sent to heaven.  The colonists lives were focused around serving God, partly because it was the norm and partly because they feared the wrath of God.  Wyatt and Gary’s lives revolved around one idea as well, women.  The teenagers did everything to look good in front of girls; however, they always wound up embarrassing themselves.  All they could think about was why they were the losers and why they did not have girlfriends.  The ironic thing is that Wyatt and Gary were terrified of girls; they even trembled whenever they thought how they would approach one.  Wyatt, Gary and the colonists were all in love and in fear of a concept, for the colonists it was God, and for Wyatt and Gary it was women.  The United State of America bursted out from the colonies because the colonists felt that they were not being treated equal to the British; similarly, Wyatt and Gary rebelled and fought against their own standing in society.  Towards the end of the movie, when the party had gone wrong and had been crashed by two bikers and an Indian, Gary and Wyatt finally took a stand for themselves and kicked the unwanted guests out, showing the other teenagers that they were “real”, brave men.  Benjamin Franklins’ and Wyatt’s status in their respective families are strangely similar.  Wyatt’s older brother, Chet,  harassed and bullied Wyatt throughout the movie.  Franklin’s elder brother beat him as well.  Weird Science and early American literature, seemingly polar opposites, are actually quasi similar.